archives
- March 2010 (23)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (45)
- December 2009 (38)
- November 2009 (46)
- October 2009 (64)
- September 2009 (64)
- August 2009 (55)
- July 2009 (70)
- June 2009 (60)
- May 2009 (30)
- April 2009 (20)
- March 2009 (9)
register for email updates
Loading...Atlanta & DeKalb
gov't watchdogs
investigative news
links for consumers
non-profit oversight
private watchdogs
unfiltered blogroll
atlanta mainstream
Judge refuses to block release of Kathryn Johnston file
A Fulton County judge this morning refused to block an oversight board’s access to investigative files in the fatal 2006 police shooting of Kathryn Johnston.
Atlanta police, in response to a subpoena, turned over files in the Johnston shooting to the city’s Citizen Review Board on Tuesday. A day earlier, on the July 6 subpoena deadline, lawyers for the International Brotherhood of Police Officers went to court trying to stop transfer of the files.
But Superior Court Judge Wendy Shoob told the IBPO’s lawyer today that his timing was off.
“I think you’re too late on the production of documents and the issue is moot,” Shoob said. ”And then I think you’re too early to object to the release of any findings of the [review board's] investigation.”
The review board, created in the aftermath of Johnston’s death in a bungled drug raid, had been pushing for months to see files in the Johnston case and the 2008 shooting of Pierre George, an apparently unarmed robbery suspect. Until the subpoena was issued, police had resisted giving up the files until their own internal inquiries had been completed.
The police union, in court papers filed Monday, argued the review board was not entitled to files of open investigations into officer-involved shootings. The union said handing over the files could endanger those officers’ rights to due process.
“The premature release of departmental information and records would jeopardize the integrity of the investigation and the involved officers’ rights,” IBPO attorney David A. Beall wrote in his request for an injunction.
The review board’s attorney, Lem Ward, argued today the union was too late and had no standing to challenge release of the documents. The board, he said, has a right to the files because its work is part of the city’s investigative process.
The files will remain confidential while the Review Board’s internal investigation is open, Ward said. Once it is completed, he said, the union will have adequate time to go to court to prevent the board’s findings from being released to the public.

Johnston (right) was shot and killed in her Neal Street home in November 2006 by members of a narcotics unit serving a no-knock search warrant obtained with falsified information. After the shooting, officers planted marijuana at the scene to make it appear the raid was legitimate.
Three Atlanta officers are serving federal prison sentences for their roles in the shooting. Two others have admitted related crimes, including involvement in a ring that collected payments from businesses in high-crime areas in exchange for a police presence.
Federal prosecutors have said their findings — contained in a report delivered to Atlanta police late last year — might lead to prosecutions or disciplinary action against other officers. The department’s Office of Professional Standards has been investigating the Johnston shooting and related matters since then.
Three officers remain on paid leave while that investigation continues.
Email This Post
more from this category
- City Council to debate powers of police oversight board
- Report: ATL police oversight panel needs stronger subpoena power
- Police oversight board looks to mayor and chief for cooperation
- APD still investigating police ‘protection’ ring, drug squad
- ‘Consistent rejection, lack of cooperation’ from ATL police
- Oversight board bemoans APD’s continued foot-dragging
- APD overseers call out mayor on cops’ non-cooperation
- Oversight panel: APD officers refuse cooperation, chief unresponsive
- 18 officers subpoenaed to testify in Eagle Bar raid
- Overseers to probe alleged arrest quotas, ‘extra jobs’ at APD























No Comments, Comment or Ping
Reply to “Judge refuses to block release of Kathryn Johnston file”