<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burkhalter tops Richardson in campaign fund-raising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2009/07/08/burkhalter-tops-richardson-in-campaign-fund-raising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2009/07/08/burkhalter-tops-richardson-in-campaign-fund-raising/</link>
	<description>Nothing but the truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:33:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bozarth</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2009/07/08/burkhalter-tops-richardson-in-campaign-fund-raising/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bozarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/?p=587#comment-222</guid>
		<description>What is interesting about these contributions is that it they are arriving  a year and a half before there is any election. The top seven in the list are not likely to have any election challenge, even when 2010 comes. (Three of them had no opponent in 2008. The other four had only token opposition.) Each maintains a huge war chest carried over from past elections.

So why the big bucks coming in early for election expenses that will likely never be incurred? The answer is simple. The donors want access to the power, and these insiders want to build up a financial juggernaut that will discourage any viable opponent from challenging them. Many of these dollars end up being passed on to the party or other candidates. Not a pretty picture! There just might be a better way to finance campaigns. Do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is interesting about these contributions is that it they are arriving  a year and a half before there is any election. The top seven in the list are not likely to have any election challenge, even when 2010 comes. (Three of them had no opponent in 2008. The other four had only token opposition.) Each maintains a huge war chest carried over from past elections.</p>
<p>So why the big bucks coming in early for election expenses that will likely never be incurred? The answer is simple. The donors want access to the power, and these insiders want to build up a financial juggernaut that will discourage any viable opponent from challenging them. Many of these dollars end up being passed on to the party or other candidates. Not a pretty picture! There just might be a better way to finance campaigns. Do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your morning jolt: F-22 fight moves from sniping to data &#124; Political Insider</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2009/07/08/burkhalter-tops-richardson-in-campaign-fund-raising/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Your morning jolt: F-22 fight moves from sniping to data &#124; Political Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/?p=587#comment-6</guid>
		<description>[...] Atlanta Unflitered: Burkhalter tops Richardson in campaign fund-raising. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Atlanta Unflitered: Burkhalter tops Richardson in campaign fund-raising. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

