archives
- March 2010 (23)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (45)
- December 2009 (38)
- November 2009 (46)
- October 2009 (64)
- September 2009 (64)
- August 2009 (55)
- July 2009 (70)
- June 2009 (60)
- May 2009 (30)
- April 2009 (20)
- March 2009 (9)
register for email updates
Loading...Atlanta & DeKalb
gov't watchdogs
investigative news
links for consumers
non-profit oversight
private watchdogs
unfiltered blogroll
atlanta mainstream
Possible MARTA conflict could become $45 million headache
A potential conflict of interest involving a MARTA vendor and a state legislator could turn out to be a $45 million headache. Or, if it’s not worked out, state Sen. Doug Stoner could be out of a job.
The MARTA board punted Tuesday on a request to consider a waiver of its conflict policy for the engineering firm PBS&J. The board will consider the matter again in November. In the meantime, MARTA’s lawyers will sort out the implications of its conflict regulations, and its ethics committee will discuss whether the agency’s 37-year-old code of ethics needs some tweaks.
The company hired Stoner in February, shortly after he joined the Legislature’s MARTA Oversight Committee. MARTA paid PBS&J about $52,000 for surveying work for the transit agency last year. The firm is also one of three in a joint venture that serves as its general engineering consultant.
The joint venture, Metropolitan Atlanta Transit Consultants, has a three-year contract with MARTA that paid it nearly $18 million last year. Overall, MATC could collect about $45 million under the deal.
PBS&J asked for the waiver recently after the potential conflict was brought to its attention. The firm said it did not believe there was an conflict because Stoner’s work involves wastewater and energy facilities, not transit.
MARTA officials were clearly concerned, in a committee discussion Tuesday, of disrupting work on several continuing projects if PBS&J were not granted the waiver.
Board member Ed Wall, one of several who said they were disinclined to vote for the waiver, asked what the engineering firm would do in that case.
“Then we’d have to re-evaluate what kind of relationship we’re going to have” with Stoner, PBS&J vice president Douglas Hooker said.
Board member Michael Tyler underscored the implications of that statement: “This employee not being in the employ of PBS&J. That’s another viable alternative.”
The MARTA board considered a similar issue in August when Edelman Public Relations, which employs member Barbara Babbit Kaufman’s daughter, was up for a contract worth up to $100,000. Edelman withdrew from consideration before the issue was resolved.
MARTA has waived its conflict-of-interest provision once, when the law firm of Holland & Knight was hired to lobby in Washington. State Sen. Kasim Reed, a candidate for mayor of Atlanta, is a partner in the firm’s Atlanta office.
What would happen if Reed were to be elected mayor, someone asked at a MARTA committee meeting Tuesday. No one had an answer.
Email This Post
more from this category
- MARTA close to resolving conflict issue over senator’s job
- Cobb lawmaker’s public, private transit interests overlap
- MARTA panel: Waive conflict policy for Kaufman’s daughter
- Study: MARTA sales taxes won’t bounce back til 2017
- Chambers threatens MARTA board members over lobbyist vote
- MARTA legislative panel butts heads with GM (and each other)
- MARTA hires lobbyist for 2010; Chambers accused of trying to force state takeover
- Audit: MARTA made $15 million from risky AIG-backed leaseback deals
- MARTA Begins Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Approval Process
- Advisors: BeltLine leaders leaving us out of the loop























No Comments, Comment or Ping
Reply to “Possible MARTA conflict could become $45 million headache”