archives
- September 2010 (5)
- August 2010 (49)
- July 2010 (49)
- June 2010 (51)
- May 2010 (65)
- April 2010 (52)
- March 2010 (50)
- February 2010 (47)
- January 2010 (45)
- December 2009 (38)
- November 2009 (46)
- October 2009 (64)
- September 2009 (64)
- August 2009 (55)
- July 2009 (70)
- June 2009 (60)
- May 2009 (30)
- April 2009 (20)
- March 2009 (9)
register for email updates
Loading...Atlanta & DeKalb
gov't watchdogs
investigative news
links for consumers
non-profit oversight
private watchdogs
unfiltered blogroll
atlanta mainstream
Lawyers sue state over gaps in indigent defense
Nearly 200 indigent defendants have no state-paid lawyer to handle their appeals, even though it’s required by Georgia law, according to a lawsuit filed today.
Many of the defendants have waited more than a year without an attorney, and some more than three years, the complaint alleges.
The state has two full-time attorneys, one part-time lawyer and $300,000 to hire private counsel for indigent defendants assigned to the Georgia Public Defenders Standards Council’s appellate division, according to the complaint. In 2008, the appellate division had five full-time attorneys.
Those lawyers juggle more than 475 cases, of which 187 have no attorney assigned. Fifty-five percent have been had no attorney for a year or more.
That caseload has exploded since the Georgia Supreme Court ruled in February 2008 that a convicted defendant is entitled to a new attorney to help determine whether the trial attorney did an adequate job. The division had 75 cases in March 2008 and 235 cases by November 2008, according to memos obtained under the Georgia Open Records Act.
National standards call for an criminal attorney to handle no more than 25 appeals in one year.
A year ago, the director of the appellate division told her superiors that the caseload had “passed the crisis point.” In a separate memo, Jimmonique Rodgers wrote:
Despite initial hopes, many attorneys across the state were unwilling to accept appellate appointments from us because of the time and efforts inherent in handling appellate cases, and the limited compensation the Agency was able to pay. … the deluge of cases pouring in under Garland v. State has created the predicted crisis. Despite the best efforts of our attorneys to handle more than the contemplated 25 ‘paper appeals’ we are receiving significant backlash from both local judges and clients, further complicating the management of an impossible caseload.
The complaint asks a judge to order the state to provide an appellate attorney within 30 days of being notified that an indigent defendant doesn’t have one.
Lawyers from four firms and the Southern Center for Human Rights filed the complaint in Fulton County Superior Court. The Georgia Public Defenders Standards Council and Gov. Sonny Perdue are defendants.
Plaintiffs in the case include two defendants who have been imprisoned for more than three years without a lawyer to seek new trial proceedings, the Southern Center for Human Rights said. Three others have been denied counsel for at least a year, and the sixth for almost 10 months.
Said Michael A. Caplan, an attorney with Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, in a prepared statement:
This case shows that at its current funding levels, the GPDSC is incapable of meeting its obligations to provide counsel to those accused and convicted of crimes. If the State does not meet its obligation to fund indigent defense, then the courts will intervene and require it to do so. When our system of criminal justice does not itself comply with the rule of law, its integrity is fairly questioned. That integrity is what is at issue in this case.
more from this category
- Fulton judge orders state to hire lawyers for indigents
- Indigent defendants in NE Ga. win state’s promise of an attorney
- Has funding shortage tainted Pike County death penalty prosecution?
- Negligence claim vs. deputies revived in courthouse shootings
- Fired DeKalb rec director had stormy 7-year history
- Was Troy Davis railroaded? Read defense affidavits & decide for yourself
- Embattled judge: Is he a Southern gentleman, or incompetent?
- Federal court: “Shocking evidence” of racial bias in DeKalb parks dept.
- 2nd ethics panel attorney resigns after OIG probe
- Inconsistencies surface in feds’ accounts of detainee’s death

2 Comments
Neal Smith
It is time to ask Gov. Perdue how he can justifiy $23M from the state budget for his “Go Fish” program when our basic judicial system is in the tank. It is clear that this state is governed by a simple-minded redneck with a legislature of “rednecks in training.”
Denise
What can be done if I was forced to represent myself in a criminal trial? The judge told me that I could not get indigent defense until after I had been convicted.
Reply to “Lawyers sue state over gaps in indigent defense”